Ripple (XRP) General Counsel Slams SEC For “Crossing Legal Boundaries”

Share this story:

 

The United States Securities and Exchange Commission’s (SEC) lawsuit against blockchain payment service provider Ripple (XRP) has reached a pivotal point as both parties submitted independent motions for summary judgement, seeking a long overdue end to the case.

Following news of the filing, Stuart Alderoty, Ripple’s General Counsel, went on the attack, saying: “Today’s filings show that the SEC is acting outside their legal limits. The SEC is not looking to apply the law – they are looking to remake the law in the hopes that it can impermissibly expand their jurisdiction.”

“After two years of litigation, the SEC is unable to identify any contract for investment (that’s what the statute requires); and cannot satisfy a single prong of the Supreme Court’s Howey test. Everything else is just noise,” Alderoty stated, taking to Twitter.

The day is finally here – our motion for summary judgment is public – you can view it here https://t.co/XGKPWQGJp9

— Stuart Alderoty (@s_alderoty) September 17, 2022

Alderoty’s view was seconded by Brad Garlinghouse, CEO of Ripple, who said: “Today’s filings make it clear the SEC isn’t interested in applying the law. They want to remake it all in an impermissible effort to expand their jurisdiction far beyond the authority granted to them by Congress.”

Ripple (XRP) vs SEC – An Ongoing Feud

The Ripple vs. SEC saga seems to be heading to its final conclusion as both parties called for the federal judge overseeing the case to make an immediate ruling on whether Ripple’s XRP sales violated U.S. securities laws.

The motion for summary judgment comes two years after the SEC sued Ripple for allegedly raising $1.3 billion through unregistered securities sales of the XRP.

In a crucial development for the case, the judge in charge of the case, Magistrate Judge Sarah Netburn, denied the SEC’s plea for attorney-client privilege in regards to the Hinman speech docs.

Expanding on the motion of summary judgement, Alderoty further asserted that “Congress only gave the SEC jurisdiction over securities. Let’s get back to what the law says.”

On the Flipside

The SEC has been on the receiving end of varied points of criticism based on its perceived hostile approach toward crypto. Alderoty has previously demanded the halt of the SEC’s regulatory attacks on crypto, emphasizing the urgent need for sensible crypto legislation from Washington.

Why You Should Care

Ripple (XRP) outlined its potential plan to move to Canada in the event that it loses its case against the SEC.

Read about the SEC v/s Ripple case up to now:
SEC vs Ripple: Hundreds Of XRP Holders Join Class Action Lawsuit

More on Stuart Alderoty’s calls for fair crypto laws:
Ripple Counsel Stuart Alderoty Calls For Fair Crypto Laws

 Read More 

All provided materials and tools are for entertainment purposes only and should never be considered financial advice. Crypto News 19 will not take any responsibility for lost funds based on investments/trades made on information found here or any linking website/affiliate. This includes all social media posts and all other communications occurring under the name Crypto News 19. You should always seek professional advice before making any investment or trade.